Went to see Jackie Evancho in concert Friday, November 8. I believe comments on this performance apply to most of her concerts until her new CD drops--probably next year--though of course as we approach Christmas no doubt she'll add some seasonal songs.
This review is aimed at people who are fans of young soprano Jackie Evancho. I'll write something else for people who aren't familiar with her work.
If
this concert is the template, the new series comprises songs from her
CDs Songs from the Silver Screen and Dream with Me—nothing else (with one exception),
and no duets, either with another instrument or another singer. One
new element has been added: Jackie selecting half a dozen or so kids
from the audience to join her onstage, answer a question, and listen
to her sing two songs. But wait, there's more: the other new
element—and it's a doozy—is the singer.
Jackie is now a young lady. It's not a
complete transformation. She talks younger than she sings. But when
she's singing in her now-slimmer spaghetti-strap floor length gowns
and high heels, and in her teenage voice that's a little weaker on
top but even richer and more expressive down below, you can now see
more clearly the woman she's rapidly becoming, both in her appearance
and in her art.
If she's performing within a few hours'
drive of you it's a no brainer: go. If it's farther, requiring an
overnight stay and perhaps a flight...I'd go at least once during
this new series that I'm guessing will run until her new CD drops.
Especially if you've only seen Jackie the child perform.
I will add that seeing her live really
is different, even if you've played her CDs and even her DVDs a
thousand times. Moreover, seeing her live from good seats is even
more different. The last time we saw her was from a balcony far, far
away. This time we were in the second row center, for a lot more
money. It was worth it.
I didn't do the meet & greet, so
others must tell you about that. For my part what I'd like Team E to
do is instead or in addition have a 15 minute Q&A from the stage
before or after the concert, possibly answering written questions
submitted at the start or emailed beforehand by attendees. This is
done by many performers we've seen.
Jackie puts on a great show. It's a
little rough around the edges, as a show featuring a 13 year old is
bound to be (I wouldn't want it to seem all scripted/canned anyway).
Some of the orchestral interludes are more successful than others.
It costs more to see Jackie than any other live act we go to, and
we've seen a lot of live acts, though mostly on the college circuit.
Nevertheless Jackie has a unique voice,
even though she isn't yet doing unique songs. Just as you'll never be
able to see Jackie the child again, once Jackie is finished growing
and takes her adult form completely, you'll never be able to see
Jackie the teen again either. And she is going to be an important,
beloved performer for many years, as David Foster said and I concur.
So I think you owe it to yourself to see her at least once at this
moment in her life and career.
One other thing: the Groupon half price
offer was what we needed to persuade two friends to join us at the
concert. I've been playing them Jackie YouTube clips for three years
to no avail. But they tell me now they get it—even though their
seats were pretty far back on the main floor. You may have friends
like this, so let me encourage you to encourage them to come see her
live. Particularly if they still have young girls in the home—young
boys too.
-------------------------------
Some more detailed observations (still aimed mostly at current fans of Jackie Evancho):
My wife & I saw Jackie Evancho with a pair of close friends.
Between the four of us we represented
the gamut of Jackie's paying customers. I'm a dedicated fan. My wife
likes Jackie but not enough to participate in fan forums, and I'm not
sure she'd go to a live Jackie concert if it were up to her. She is a
Josh Groban fan, though not active on any Groban forums. In general
she rather prefers male voices while I rather prefer female voices,
though both of us certainly like lots of same-sex-as-ourselves
singers.
Our friends wouldn't have come except
for the Groupon deal. Though they came away saying they now
understood why I like her so much—despite my having played them
lots of YouTube clips over the past three years on our home theater
with a 46” screen and surround sound. It took seeing her live to
seal the deal, and they came to see her live because I twisted their
arms.
None of the four of us had had any
particular interest in child singers. My wife & I have always
loved music. She can read music and has very good pitch sense (years
of violin as a child helped). Classical Crossover is one of her
favorite genres, along with soft rock and black Motown-era music, and
Gospel music plus music of her church (Mormon). I lack her musical
training and fine pitch sense but I'm well-traveled musically, with
broader musical interests than anyone else I've ever met.
Our friends are less musical. One is
Russian and culturally Jewish, and most loves passionate Russian
folk/pop that she remembers from her youth. Her primary artistic
modality is Russian literature. The other friend is Indian and
culturally Hindu, who loves traditional popular and classical Indian
music, though he likes a lot of other stuff. We took him to a Mormon
Tabernacle Choir performance a few years ago and he loved it. Also a
lot of world music, as I've seen from many world music concerts we've
attended together.
He loved the beauty of Jackie's voice;
the song selections generally appealed to him, though he didn't have
a lot to say about particular songs. He loved the simplicity of the
presentation. He dislikes Bollywood movies and instead prefers the
old Indian tradition of a singer standing there and singing, without
being surrounded by razzamatazz.
Our Russian friend most liked Jackie's
more emotive/passionate selections, such as Impossible Dream, and she
most liked Jackie's lower register. Jackie wore two floor-length
dresses for the concert, a blue one and a black & silver one. Our
Russian friend preferred the second one, saying it looked more mature
and more suited to Jackie's current age and the maturity of her song
presentation.
Both dresses had spaghetti straps, and
she wore sparkly silver high heeled sandals under both—I'm guessing
3” heels. She wore her hair down and long—to the bottom of her
shoulder blades I'd say—in a style that tended to slip towards sort
of covering her right eye, such that she frequently reached up to
move it back.
We had tickets in the second row just
off-center, while they were in the back third of the first floor. The
tickets said “Orchestra” but it was far enough that our Indian
friend felt he'd made a mistake in not bringing binoculars.
We've attended many concerts with them,
and in general we all like being maybe 10 rows back in the center.
This was the first time I've really wanted to be close to the stage,
and I'm glad we were. Our friends certainly wanted to be closer than
they were.
Neither of them had any complaints
about Jackie selecting over half a dozen children and having them
come to the stage for two songs. They found it charming. We did two,
though being in the second row we could easily see all the kids'
expressions and body language, which helped a lot I thought. If I'd
been off in the cheap seats I don't think I'd have found it as
charming.
The kids she picked ranged in age from
three to eleven, I reckon. Mostly girls. Once they were all up there
she asked them to express a wish and then got the answer from each in
turn. One was so terrified she couldn't get a word out, but when her
grandma came up to take her back to her seat she refused and stayed
for the whole two songs and patter.
Jackie was very big sister-y through
this part. As she sang when they were on the stage seated around her
she kept making eye contact with them. When she sent the kids back to
their seats after the second song she momentarily forgot her place in
the program, seeming to think she was due to sing another song. But
then she looked down at the playlist taped to the stage and realized
it was time for the intermission. She waved to the audience, smiling
in slight embarrassment, then walked offstage quickly. She seemed at
ease in her heels and in manuvering with a floor-length dress over
those heels. Both dresses were much less flouncy than in past years.
Both had spaghetti straps for a somewhat more mature affect, though
still age-appropriate by all but the most puritanical standards.
My wife noticed that Jackie slightly
missed a high note on one of the songs, and in general we both
noticed that her top end didn't seem as effortless as the last time
we saw her perform a year and a half ago, at Davies Hall in San
Francisco. It's possible that at this point in time she's a mezzo,
though of course that could change later. I wonder whether she should
transpose some of her songs down a note or two (as long as that
doesn't push the song's low notes out of scope of course)? I don't
know the answer, but the thought did occur to me.
Let me reassure readers that these
issues were all minor quibbles. All four of us were glad we'd come to
the concert, and left feeling like we'd gotten our money's worth—and
for us (especially my wife & me) it was a lot—more than we've
ever paid for a live performance. The kind of concerts we normally
attend are at the two major universities in our area (Stanford and UC
Berkeley), and tickets there are generally a third the cost of
Jackie's. And we aren't rolling in dough. So saying we'd gotten our
money's worth doesn't come lightly. Mostly our discretionary budget
goes for scuba diving trips to southeast Asia, partly because it's a
lot cheaper there even with the airfare.
That said, I wouldn't pay to see her
again until she has new material. She announced at the beginning that
she'd be singing songs from Dream with Me and Songs from the Silver
Screen, and that's all she did. I think she's also pared down the
orchestra a bit. I think it was around two dozen musicians, while
at Davies Hall my memory tells me it was closer to three dozen.
Also there were no duets, neither with
singers nor with instruments. Nor did she do any of the songs she
sings as duets on her CDs. Variety was provided by the orchestra
doing numbers through the evening.
The least successful was a thunderous
instrumental interpretation of Queen's rock epic “Bohemian
Rhapsody.” Maybe they didn't have time enough time to rehearse it,
but it was off enough to make my wife & I look at each other &
wince occasionally. My rhythmic sense is as sharp as my wife's pitch
sense, and we both heard wowsers through the piece. Most important
was the fact that the orchestra wasn't quite on top of the rhythms
and rythmic dynamics required for this kind of music. I've seen this
issue with classical musicians before—of just not being sharp
rhythmically, and as a consequence kind of galumphing through a rock
piece.
More later.
Playlist:
1. orchestral number -- Cavellerea Rusticana
2. Pure Imagination
3. When you wish upon a star
4. Ombra mai fu
5. orchestral interlude -- Pirates of the Caribbean
6. To where you are [not from Dream with Me or Songs from the Silver Screen--the one exception]
7. Reflection
8. The Lord's Prayer
9. [intermission]
10. Lovers (sans Asian instruments)
11. (brings kids on stage) My heart will go on
12. Imaginer (ushers kids offstage after this)
13. orchestral interlude (iffy rendition of Queen's magnum opus) Bohemian Rhapsody - yeah, it was a little rough. The performance I originally sent him was really cool.
14. Se (aka Cinema Paradiso)
15. Impossible Dream (dedicated to her mother)
16. Encore: Music of the night
------
EDIT ADD:
re: Jackie's effect
Music evolved from something very like the way wolves vocalize together before going out on the hunt--as tribal reification (reinforcing the sense of shared lives, shared purpose, shared values). It has a second, unrelated evolutionary source: demonstration of fitness as a mate. Most pop music evokes the latter. Jackie evokes the former. As such she taps deeply into our innate tribalism--a "I'm part of something bigger than myself, something I honor...and need" strongly.
So her music is more than music.
EDIT ADD2:
My Russian friend said this in response to my review, entered here verbatim except for her friend's name:
Mostly agree, but want to clarify some points:
-
I don't think it is accurate to
describe me as preferring folk/pop, since the actual music you're
referring to is neither, and very far from both. I would say i prefer
ethnic music - starting from French chanson, Argentinian tango, Russian
romances, Portuguese fado, Spanish flamenco, etc, all the ways to
Japanese Taiko drums and/or American Broadway. And i do enjoy occasional
opera or a classic piece, especially if it's an already familiar one.
Although, being more of a visual creature, i do prefer ballet, or Fantasia's multi-modal approach:)
-
Both me and [my Indian friend] didn't see much value into kids-on-stage part of a
show, besides the fact that Jackie really enjoyed it - then of course,
why shouldn't she have some fun, too. But it didn't do much for me, may
be because i was too far to see the faces.
-
My main beef was about the songs selection
- it is no wonder, giving my tastes, that i preferred songs filled with
more passion and energy, and wished for even more of those. My favorite
was Lovers, followed by Impossible Dream and an old favorite from
Phantom of the Opera.
I
think i would also enjoy occasional change of pace, a fast tempo song,
or an attempt of some humor, which this time, i think, the orchestra
tried to provide.
As I recall, [my Indian friend] said that it all sounded like a one long melancholy song to him (albeit a very beautiful one).
No comments:
Post a Comment